Lecturas de tesinas
13 02 2013 Comments : Comentarios desactivados en Lecturas de tesinasCategories : Aplicaciones CAD-CAM-CAE
Dentro de las tecnologias aditivas de fabricación, hemos trabajado con las tecnicas LOM (Laminated Object Manufacturing). Os cuelgo un video de funcionamiento de esta tecnica de la empresa solido 3D.
Resultados de los moldes realizados. Edición 2012-2013:
STL ha sido el formato de archivo para imprimir objetos durante los últimos 25 años, pero tiene serias limitaciones. El nuevo formato propuesto para reemplazarlo, como estándard mundial es el AMF. He aquí una descripción del mismo:
«In a previous post we examined the STL files used for moving from 3D CAD designs to 3D printer hardware. Despite the STL format’s shortcomings it has remained the standard of the 3D printing industry for nearly 25 years. However, continued innovation, especially in 3D printing hardware, have forced a variety of stakeholders to adapt and extend the STL format to address their particular needs. Today, one can work with a standard STL file or any of a number of custom and/or proprietary STLs. Recognizing this as inefficient and unsustainable, in 2009 the ASTM Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies formed a task force to specify ‘STL 2.0’.
The committee’s goal was to create a standard additive manufacturing file format
that would be more compact than STL and would include additional features such as colors, units and materials; sort of a Portable Document Format (pdf) for additive manufacturing. In this way, as much information as possible describing an object could be included in the 3D CAD design phase before being exported in a standard format for the fabrication phase. Additive manufacturing OEMs (or others) would then develop software to read this format and use whatever information would be applicable for their particular hardware.
In June, 2011 the first revision of this new format, dubbed AMF (Additive Manufacturing Format or Additive Manufacturing File) was approved. AMF format was designed to:
- be non-proprietary
- backwards compatible with STL
- able to handle complex objects and microstructures within objects
- support ‘constellations’ of objects (e.g. a full build tray)
- be forward compatible to allow future incorporation of new features
To allow for ease of use and forward compatibility, the AMF format is text-based XML. XML is highly compressible and easy to read, write and process. An AMF file describes first the object (currently with the <mesh> tag) and then the materials and other properties relating to it’s manufacture. Significantly, AMF provides no information as to how to fabricate an object. For example, although additive fabrication requires ‘slicing’ files before generating machine paths, the inclusion of slice information was rejected as too machine-specific. Just like the 2D pdf format, the idea of the AMF format is to provide as much information as possible about and object and let each printer fabricate to the best of its abilities.
An AMF <mesh> is made up of <vertices> and volumes <volume>. Like .PLY files, all vertices <vertex> are defined (later to be referenced according to write order) and then for each <volume>, triangles (<triangle>) are defined as a set of three numbered numbered vertices. This is a bit more efficient than STL files since vertices are only defined once. An excerpt of our original 10 centimeter diameter sphere, translated to AMF format using an open source AMF editor:
00000001 <?xml version=»1.0″ encoding=»ISO-8859-1″?>
00000002 <amf>
00000003
00000004 sp
00000005
00000006
00000007
00000008
00000009 -3.06161e-015
00000010 0
00000011 -49.9999
00000012
00000013
00000014
00000015
00000016 -0.0493787
00000017 -1.40144
00000018 -49.9802
00000019
00000020
…
00173292
00173293
00173294 Default
00173295
00173296 24642
00173297 24640
00173298 24417
00173299
00173300
00173301 24640
00173302 24638
00173303 24415
00173304
…
00420820
00420821 24640
00420822 24642
00420823 24754
00420824
00420825
00420826
00420827
00420828 </amf>
With additional tags and definitions, an AMF file might actually have more lines than an equivalent STL file, but it will likely be smaller and more easily parsed. For example, although the AMF file above has 20% more lines than the equivalent STL file it is 27% smaller in size, even as human readable text.
Like STLs an AMF <mesh> can simply be composed of straight edged, planar triangles. But an AMF mesh doesn’t have to stop there. AMF triangles can more accurately describe a 3 dimensional surface by being curved edge and/or non-planar. By adding a unit normal tag (<normal>) to vertices, non-planar triangles can be described. And by adding an an <edge> tag specifying the tangent direction vector at the end of an edge, curved edge triangles can be described.
Finally, and perhaps most interestingly, an AMF mesh requires a certain depth of recursion when it is read. It is expected that a reading program will subdivide each triangle into a specified number of planar subtriangles to be used for viewing or CAM algorithms. For example, a four-fold recursion would result in each triangle being subdivided into 256 subtriangles. The encoding software would assume a four-fold recursion and would then determine the minimum number of triangles required to specify the target geometry to a chosen tolerance or precision. This results in a SIGNIFICANTLY fewer number of required triangles to define an object (although read/process times are increased slightly). For example, a 10 cm sphere defined to a precision of 10 microns requires less than 400 non-planar triangles to define. A similar STL file requires 20-50 thousand triangles. In our ealier post we were only able to reduce the number of STL triangles by reducing the precision to 1mm. Looked at another way, an STL file with a similar number of defined triangle facets is 2-3 orders of magnitude lower resolution than an AMF file describing the same surface but with non-planar, curved edge triangles.
STL Format(Binary) |
AMF Format(Curved Triangles) |
|
PRECISION |
10 micron |
10 micron |
NO. OF MESH TRIANGLES |
49,500 |
320 |
FILE SIZE |
2400k |
10k |
In choosing how to describe the surface of an object several options were considered: the STL-like triangular mesh described above; using ‘voxels’ to define a 3D bitmap; or functional representations where the function evaluates to zero at the object surface. Ultimately, to ensure a quicker transition and simple backward compatibility, the triangular mesh (<mesh>) was settled upon although this choice was not unanimous (e.g. see here). However, it is anticipated that 3D bitmap (<voxel>) and functional (<frep>) representations will be incorporated into the standard in the future.
In addition to <mesh> definition AMF goes beyond standard STL files in being able to define available materials (<material>). Materials are defined with particular properties, given an ID and subsequently associated with AMF volumes by ID. Compositions (<composite>) colors (<color>) textures (<texture> etc. can be specified for various materials. Microstructures, colored or textured objects can now be defined in CAD programs and then have that information available in a standard AMF file. 3D printers would then use whatever information the need to match their capabilities. Can’t create compositions or colors? That information would simply be ignored.
AMF also allows for the creation of groups of objects in constellations (<constellation>. Instances (<instance>) of defined objects (<object>) are grouped under the <constellation> tag and specify the displacement and rotation of each instance of an object. In this way, entire build envelopes can be specified.
Finally, AMF allows for the incorporation of metadata (<metadata>) at whatever level is feasible. A number of ‘types’ have been reserved including Name, Author, Company, Description, Volume, Tolerance, etc. and they can be placed under everything from the top-level <amf> tag all the way down to the <vertex> tag.
The AMF format is an exciting development in an area that has seen little in the last 20 years. It will now be possible to more accurately define objects using a simpler more efficient file structure.
Unfortunately, though a first revision has been approved there is little use for it at this time; CAD programs are incapable of exporting in AMF format and 3D printer OEM programs do not allow for AMF import. The ASTM F42.04 committee predicted that «Big CAD» will first allow for export of basic geometry to AMF files and 3D printer OEMs will allow for imports of AMF files with information that supports their unique hardware capabilities such as color or material specifications. The committee hopes that in parallel smaller or new CAD companies will introduce programs to actually create objects with different microstructures, colors, grade materials etc. which the AMF format – an a number of actual printers – already support. Finally Big CAD would/should follow.
Will it happen? More than likely. The committee has done a good job of creating a robust, extensible format that addresses both the increased 3D CAD and 3D printing capabilities which now exist. All that are needed are conversion and creation tools. To that end, Hod Lipson and Johnathan Hiller have developed an STL-AMF converter/viewer, a second generation STL-AMF converter/viewer (although we found it a bit buggy) and are working on open source C++ libraries for basic AMF functionality including read/write/view etc.
In the meantime, for most of us, we must simply sit tight and wait for new or existing software to incorporate the AMF format. For those with programming skills this might represent an opportunity. With open source C++ libraries, it may be possible for independent programmers to begin developing the solutions which the industry needs but which, it is expected, Big CAD and OEMs will be hesitant to implement.»
En la sesión de prototipado se realizaron moldes de silicona de diversas piezas, hasta un total de cuatro moldes.
links de interés sobre additive manufacturing.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an appropriate name to describe the technologies that build 3D objects by adding layer-upon-layer of material, whether the material is plastic, metal, concrete or one day…..human tissue.
Common to AM technologies is the use of a computer, 3D modeling software (Computer Aided Design or CAD), machine equipment and layering material. Once a CAD sketch is produced, the AM equipment reads in data from the CAD file and lays downs or adds successive layers of liquid, powder, sheet material or other, in a layer-upon-layer fashion to fabricate a 3D object.
The term AM encompasses many technologies including 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping (RP), Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM), layered manufacturing and additive fabrication.
AM application is limitless. Early use of AM in the form of Rapid Prototyping focused on preproduction visualization models. More recently, AM is being used to fabricate end-use products in aircraft, dental restorations, medical implants, automobiles, and even fashion products.
While the adding of layer-upon-layer approach is simple, there are many applications of AM technology with degrees of sophistication to meet diverse needs including:
+ a visualization tool in design
+ a means to create highly customized products for consumers and professionals alike
+ as industrial tooling
+ to produce small lots of production parts
+ one day….production of human organs
At MIT, where the technology was invented, projects abound supporting a range of forward-thinking applications from multi-structure concrete to machines that can build machines; while work at Contour Crafting supports structures for people to live and work in.
Some envision AM as a compliment to foundational subtractive manufacturing (removing material like drilling out material) and to lesser degree forming (like forging). Regardless, AM may offer consumers and professionals alike, the accessibility to create, customize and/or repair product, and in the process, redefine current production technology.
Whether simple or sophisticated, AM is indeed AMazing and best described in the adding of layer-upon-layer, whether in plastic, metal, concrete or one day…human tissue”.
Examples of Additive Manufacturing (AM)
+ SLA
Very high end technology utilizing laser technology to cure layer-upon-layer of photopolymer resin (polymer that changes properties when exposed to light).
The build occurs in a pool of resin. A laser beam, directed into the pool of resin, traces the cross-section pattern of the model for that particular layer and cures it. During the build cycle, the platform on which the build is repositioned, lowering by a single layer thickness. The process repeats until the build or model is completed and fascinating to watch. Specialized material may be need to add support to some model features. Models can be machined and used as patterns for injection molding, thermoforming or other casting processes.
+ FDM
Process oriented involving use of thermoplastic (polymer that changes to a liquid upon the application of heat and solidifies to a solid when cooled) materials injected through indexing nozzles onto a platform. The nozzles trace the cross-section pattern for each particular layer with the thermoplastic material hardening prior to the application of the next layer. The process repeats until the build or model is completed and fascinating to watch. Specialized material may be need to add support to some model features. Similar to SLA, the models can be machined or used as patterns. Very easy-to-use and cool.
+ MJM
Multi-Jet Modeling is similar to an inkjet printer in that a head, capable of shuttling back and forth (3 dimensions-x, y, z)) incorporates hundreds of small jets to apply a layer of thermopolymer material, layer-by-layer.
+3DP
This involves building a model in a container filled with powder of either starch or plaster based material. An inkjet printer head shuttles applies a small amount of binder to form a layer. Upon application of the binder, a new layer of powder is sweeped over the prior layer with the application of more binder. The process repeats until the model is complete. As the model is supported by loose powder there is no need for support. Additionally, this is the only process that builds in colors.
+ SLS
Somewhat like SLA technology Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) utilizes a high powered laser to fuse small particles of plastic, metal, ceramic or glass. During the build cycle, the platform on which the build is repositioned, lowering by a single layer thickness. The process repeats until the build or model is completed. Unlike SLA technology, support material is not needed as the build is supported by unsintered material.
fuente: http://additivemanufacturing.com/basics/
3D Printing Fasotec Fetus replicas Shape of an Angel
by James Plafke | 2:45 pm, July 31st, 2012
If pictures of your ultrasound and the resulting child weren’t enough of a memory of being pregnant with said child, you can now get a 3D printout of your fetus to help commemorate all the promise your unborn child held before it was born and started listening to that music you hate.
Japanese engineering company Fasotec is now helping spruce up the mantle over your fireplace by offering “Shape of an Angel,” a 3D-printed replica of your fetus while it was in the womb. The process of making the 3D-printed replica is fairly simple as far as 3D printing goes. The fetus is photographed using an MRI, then run through 3D imaging software and sent to the 3D printer. White resin is used to make the fetus, and clear resin is used to make the mother’s womb, and the positioning and appearance of the model fetus matches that of the actual fetus.
A printout, which measures in at around 90 x 60 x 40 millimeters, will burn hole in your pocket around the size of $1,230. Amusingly, the printout comes in a tasteful jewelry box.
Thanks, Japan.
fuente: http://www.geekosystem.com/3d-printed-fetus-replica/
Podeis leer tambien el articulo del pais: http://sociedad.elpais.com/sociedad/2013/01/03/actualidad/1357237189_855799.html

sobre la web en este link